Racism is hard. It’s hard because it is a thing that exists in all of us, even those of us with Liberal Arts educations. It’s hard because more often than not, it’s a question of feelings and feelings are nebulous. When I read Asha Alexander’s article, I found her struggling with her own feelings. It was a thoughtful and compelling piece, but even after multiple reads I don’t think she never quite managed to define what it was she found, for lack of a better word, racist in the Greek students stepping performance. I respected her feeling as legitimate, but I didn’t understand it fully. So I came up with a question I wanted to ask Asha so I could better understand what she was getting at, a question that I felt was, unlike almost every other question asked of her in the comments section, legitimate and possibly even productive. I wondered, What would respectful stepping by a bunch of white people look like? Would it be a step performance that even without black performers somehow demonstrated that it had an awareness and appreciation for the art form as an institution? For its history and significance?
This then, as all good questions do, got me to thinking. Somewhere deep down in the sea of obnoxiousness that followed Asha’s article, some young buck pointed out that nobody really considers Eric Clapton a racist for appropriating the blues even though the blues are ten times the holy institution to African-American culture that stepping is. I pondered this for a while, and it occurred to me that the reason that Eric Clapton or even Kurt Cobain isn’t a racist when they play old blues songs, is because when they play their music, when Cobain sings Robert Johnson’s “Where Did You Sleep Last Night,” it’s clear that they love and admire and believe in the art form. They’re engaging with it. Honoring it. That’s why it’s not racist. That’s why it’s not offensive. Yet, when I’m in my backyard pulling weeds and singing “Swing Low Sweet Chariot” in my best sick-moose falsetto, I am being a little offensive because even though I’m just screwing around and having fun and don’t mean any harm, I’m debasing, if you will, the sacred institution of the Negro spiritual.
It is my hunch, then, though I wasn’t there to see it, that the stepping performance that these Greeks engaged in was a pretty bad example of stepping. So bad in fact that what Asha was perhaps picking up on was that what the Greeks were doing did not seem like a step performance at all but a parody of stepping, an inadvertent parody maybe, but a parody nonetheless. This, then, is why it’s offensive, not because white people can’t steal black culture, or some ephemeral instance of white privilege, but because appropriating a distinctly black cultural form like stepping and then performing it badly, performing it in a way that degrades and insults that form, is to effectively fall into that white cultural art form of appropriating black culture as a way to mock black culture for a white audience—Black Face. Again, inadvertent Black Face, no ill intentions Black Face, no shoe polish on the face Black Face, but Black Face. The Black Face that perfectly decent people engage in everyday. The Black Face that we all participate in from time to time because we’re all racists, because we’re all Americans and America is racist society, and that society is what gave birth to us and imprinted itself on us, and from that we can never be free. It’s instinctive in who we are. We can do better, we can try harder, but we can never overcome, not even if we vote for Barack Obama, not even if we take an African-American studies class, not even if we have perfectly innocent intentions.
The question can never be then, who is and isn’t a racist. Once we enter into that, no work can be done. We might as well all turn off the internet and go home. Instead, if there is moral in what Asha wrote and how we all responded, a teachable moment that allows all of us to be a little less racist, it’s not that black culture can’t be appropriated, not that you can’t sing the blues, or step, or play jazz trumpet, because so long as black culture remains compelling, those things are inevitable and ultimately productive because they allow those things to become part of our shared cultural heritage as Americans the same way that baseball or the Babylonian Exile became part of American black cultural heritage. It is only that when we make those appropriations, when we begin to make that effort to come together over these cultural products or institutions, we can’t be dunderheads about it. We can’t be haphazard. We can’t just be screwing around. We can’t do it just for the yucks, because to imitate other people’s cultures, their art forms and important traditions, as a joke, as a thing to be laughed at, no matter how well meaning, is to belittle them and degrade them, and belittling and degrading people, even inadvertently, makes you something worse than a racist, a jerk. Though, my dear Alleghenians, not one single one of you will ever cease to be a racist any more than you will cease to be a human being, what you can do, with effort and careful reflection, is to perhaps one day cease to be a jerk. And that is all anyone really asks of anyone.
Allegheny • Apr 26, 2013 at 7:36 pm
I recently wrote a Motion for Summary Judgment for the 12th circuit concerning parody and copyright infringement and it makes me think about your piece. In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. the Supreme Court Justices considered common conceptions about parody in order to classify different ways a defendant could raise a claim of “fair use.”
Legal mumbo jumbo aside – these Justices basically defined parody as a purposeful appropriation of some elements from a prior work in order to make a comment through ridicule. If a defendant establishes parody – then their work is not considered “copyright infringement” but rather a new form of art with a new message (ridicule).
Granted, the Greek life members could have intended to ridicule this form of dance. However, as a proud alum of Allegheny I would like to think differently. If we consider the intention of the Greek life members at this event, it is clear that were most likely incorporating these moves into their routine because they admired step as an art form. Therefore, the SAMS dance was not wrong because it was a “parody” (a form of ridicule). Rather, it is wrong because it infringes upon the creativity of the original dance performed by African Americans, creating a shallow replacement (similar to copyright infringement).
Allegheny Student • Apr 26, 2013 at 7:25 pm
“young buck” seems like a /very/ unfortunate choice of words for what’s going on here
Bucktopus Otherkinnius • Apr 26, 2013 at 9:59 pm
How do you know which animal he transspecies identifies as? CIS SPECIES SCUM
Allegheny Student • Apr 27, 2013 at 12:17 am
i know you’re being facetious or w/e but young buck was actually a slave seller’s term for a young black man who will work hard
That guy • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Are we all forgetting that there were black students in at least one of the routines? Who is to say that the members of these organizations were not educated on these routines? It is so fucking typical that the social justice elite at this school to instantly assume that because these students were white they are ignorant of everyone else’s culture. In case you didn’t know, that makes you the one who is ignorant!
Oh. • Apr 27, 2013 at 12:07 am
It is also ignorant of you to assume that anyone who is offended by anything is a part of the “social justice elite” that you speak of. And you’re right, who is to say that they weren’t educated just because one or two black people were in the routine (as if all black people are educated on the subject, just because they are black uh?). And no one assumes that all white people are ignorant of everyone else’s culture, but by differentiating “white” from “everyone else” just shows that you are ignorant of a lot of things sir, as many of your peers are as well. It is no secret that students at Allegheny are totally unaware of different cultures (and respecting different cultures, for that matter), or else conversations such as these would not be so heated and frustrating. You contradict yourself on so many levels sir. Grow up, and good day!
GrizzlyLover • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:07 pm
Important question, can I step simply because I like the dance style?
Saul • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:29 pm
No Grizzly, stepping is reserved only for Blacks only. If you’re opposed to this inclusive policy, you are an evil racist 😛 Good day, sir…
yuh boi • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:02 pm
i dont like racism it makes me not wanna eat fried chicken
GrizzlyLover • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:15 pm
and I don’t get my purple drank to wash it down
Student • Apr 26, 2013 at 1:28 am
I really appreciate this article. I think it was well thought out and articulated. However, just as it was well thought out and articulated, so was the dancing presented. As a dancer of 18 years, I have had lessons in the art of Step. As a white student, I will never fully understand African American culture, but I do not think it is fair to assume stepping is done without knowledge.
Two years ago, Step Afrika took the stage in Shafer and they taught us that stepping is something to be appreciated and admired. It is a hard form of dance, and they wanted to share the intricate steps with us. They taught us history and culture. So even if I had not grown up with dance experience, I learned it that day Freshman year.
GrizzlyLover • Apr 26, 2013 at 12:20 pm
Do you think its offensive for students who simply like the dance style to incorporate it into their dance routines?
Oh. • Apr 27, 2013 at 12:02 am
Actually, in her article, Asha was not saying that the stepping was offensive simply because of the dance being done; she was saying that it is offensive for Greek organizations at Allegheny to incorporate a practice that is a part of the culture of historically black organizations, but refusing to even take the time out to learn about historically black Greek organizations or to consider having any at Allegheny (since, Allegheny is “not ready” for such organizations was was proposed by some). So to answer your question, no, it is not offensive to incorporate the dance style simply because you like it. That was not the offensive aspect at all.
Carolyn Shetter • Apr 25, 2013 at 7:02 am
This is a really nice article, thanks for writing it. I like your Eric Clapton and Kurt Cobain examples. This was a really classy way to address the jerks from the comments in Asha’s article.