Kyle Whyte delivers talk on Native Americans and climate change
Scholar and activist visits to participate in global health studies course
Environmental Activist and Native American Scholar Kyle Whyte of Michigan State University addressed the issues surrounding the Dakota Access Pipeline and other Native American environmental justice movements at Allegheny College on Tuesday, April 18. In the Henderson Auditorium of Quigley Hall, Whyte presented a lecture titled “Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Health: From the ‘Right to be Cold’ to Defeating the Dakota Access Pipeline” for the Allegheny community.
Despite the protestation of hundreds of Native Americans in North and South Dakota, President Donald Trump has continued to encourage the advancement of the Dakota Access Pipeline to add thousands of miles to the United States’ oil network. As the pipeline construction has been rerouted, the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation is now subjected to potentially severe environmental consequences, and President Trump’s executive action has consequently become an international cry to protect the land and rights of all indigenous people.
“[Whyte] was actually personally affected by the topics he discussed since he is a member of an Oklahoma Native American tribe,” Brittani Vesico, ’17, said. “The presentation was interesting because he’s a scholar beyond expertise, he has real involvement in his studies.”
Whyte is an associate professor of philosophy and community sustainability and a faculty affiliate of the American Indian and Indigenous Studies and Environmental Science programs at the Michigan State University. He is also an enrolled member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation in Shawnee, Oklahoma.
“[Whyte] focused on sustainable development and its implications on Native American health,” Ananya Yerramreddy, ’17, said. “Through his involvement with Native American tribes nationwide, he could first-hand explain the detrimental effects of forcing tribes to relocate. Indigenous tribes are forced to adapt to new environmental and cultural landscapes.”
Throughout the lecture Whyte conveyed that indigenous people are negatively impacted by the effects of climate change. For instance, Whyte elaborated on how the rising sea levels have financially and emotionally damaged tribal communities. The flooding has displaced many tribal members from the land they once inhabited; the majority of the time the land hold cultural significance to the population and when they are forced to leave it hurts their community.
Whyte said that climate change also threatens the agriculture indigenous communities depend on for their nutrition. The warm temperature destroys the harvest of plants like rice, corn and grains. This occurrence drastically depletes their food source. Additionally, fish are another source of protein that Native Americans depend upon, but fisheries have been limited because of the rising temperature of the ocean.
Whyte also commented on the emotional strain climate change has on indigenous communities. Elders within the community often experience depression and other mental health issues because climate change has altered their understanding of weather patterns and agricultural practices. Whyte said they are saddened by the fact that they can no longer impart their wisdom to others residing within their tribe.
“In my environmental science class we are currently discussing how pollution and climate change disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and developing countries. The talk was interesting to me because it discussed those same themes, but in the context of indigenous people,” said Amasa Smith, ’17. “It went farther to discuss how colonialism, change in environment and forced migration of native tribes has directly impacted their health.”
Students and faculty of varying departments attended the lecture Tuesday night, and left with a new perspective regarding environmental justice.
“While we may not recognize it, government actions force tribes to adapt to new climates, new societal norms, and these people have to alter their entire way of life,” Vesico said.
Paul R. Jones • Apr 20, 2017 at 11:16 pm
This article is an astonishing piece of a deplorable lack of journalist curiosity regarding U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” since The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924! That single Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, made moot all previous common law-state and federal-including Presidential Executive Orders, Commerce Clause and Treaty Clause alleged Indian Treaties (if any U.S. Senate confirmed Indian treaties actually existed pre-1924 Citizenship) regarding U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” so often touted by politicians and Indian advocates as being legitimate law. It never ceases to amaze me that not one Article III judge adheres to their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution from fraud upon the Court petitions to adjudicate alleged common law-state and federal-that does not exist…that law being Title 25-INDIANS!
And yet, politicians and MSM continue to perpetuate willful blindness to the Constitutional absurdity that Congress, Presidents/Governors, Initiatives and Referendums can make distinguishable the capacities, metes and boundaries of a select group of U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” post citizenship.
The United States Constitution makes for no provisions for:
1. Indian sovereign nations. None of the asserted tribes possess any of the attributes of being a ‘sovereign nation:’ a. No Constitution recognition b. No international recognition c. No fixed borders d. No military e. No currency f. No postal system g. No passports
2. Treaties with its own constituency
3. Indian reservations whereby a select group of U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race”
reside exclusively and to the exclusion of all others, on land-with rare exception-that is owned by the People of the United States according to federal documents readily available on-line that notes rights of renters as ‘occupancy and use’ by these distinguished U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” only with the land owned by the People of the United States.
4. Recognition of ‘Indian citizenship’ asserted by various tribes. There is no international recognition of “Indian citizenship” as there is no ‘nation’ from which citizenship is derived.
A simple question for politicians and MSM to answer…a question so simple, it is hard:
“Where is the proclamation ratified by 1/3rd of the voters of the United States that amends the Constitution to make the health, welfare, safety and benefits of a select group of U.S./State citizens distinguishable because of their “Indian ancestry/race?”