The Campus

Donate to The Campus
$50
$500
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (4)

All The Campus Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • J

    James D. ChamberlainFeb 8, 2012 at 9:19 pm

    You blind yourself when fool yourself into believing that
    because special interest groups who attack the American standard of majority
    vote are “a lot of good people”.  A lot
    of good people exercised their freedom to vote the legitimate law onto the books
    – there is your fact.  The woman you
    refer to was doing her job as she was directed to when political interests
    ganged up on her – get your facts straight. 
    Planned Parenthood is an abortion mill that offers no service which will
    justify the murder of babies – and I will not rest until they are shut
    down. 

    http://youtu.be/kEja-1emRic

    Reply
  • A

    AmandaMar 13, 2011 at 7:36 pm

    This and the other articles written by you that I have read have got to be some of the most ignorant writings I have ever had the misfortune to read. You bring up banal and tired stereotypes–I’m actually surprised you didn’t use the term “bra-burners” when referring to feminists. You have such a misguided idea of feminism that is quite comical, and you totally miss the point of the risk that loss of funding for Planned Parenthood imposes. Planned Parenthood provides a myriad of services from birth control (and not just abortions), STD testing, to cancer screenings. This has nothing to do with funding for abortions–Planned Parenthood receives no federal funding for abortions. By cutting funding, many Planned Parenthood locations will have to close, thereby reducing the availability of screenings that many people cannot otherwise afford.

    Your disdain for the human race saddens me. Even I, as an admitted misanthrope, have more confidence in and care for humanity than you.

    Reply
  • C

    Concerned IndividualMar 12, 2011 at 9:18 pm

    I’m shocked that your opinions are published in any newspaper. The logical contradictions in your arguments; the baseless assumptions you make; the consistent and (quite frankly, embarrassing) use of incendiary language simply serves to make your argument juvenile and in poor taste. You are taking an incredibly complex issue and viewing it through the lens of your conservative – even regressive – perspective. While I value a true debate, nobody could debate you: you don’t want to hear my (or anybody else’s) perspective.

    Since I doubt that you’ll change your regressive political perspective, then perhaps you would benefit from a course on inductive versus deductive reasoning, or a thorough reading of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. At the very least, muzzle yourself until you can converse rationally. You might hurt yourself, or somebody else.

    Reply
  • T

    TUGFeb 28, 2011 at 3:26 pm

    Your inflammatory language only serves to polarize what could be a very fun and interesting issue to discuss: whether or not the federal government should fund private businesses. I would have found it very interesting if you brought up, say, Blackwater and the Army’s use of paid mercenaries in Iraq and compared liberal response to that with the defunding of Planned Parenthood.

    Reply
Activate Search
Planned Parenthood & the fallacies of feminism