The Health Care Reform Bill was passed on March 23, leaving much controversy.
The Health Care Bill will cost $940 billion over ten years. It is estimated to reduce the deficit by $143 billion over the first ten years and will reduce the deficit by $1.2 trillion dollars in the second. It will also expand coverage to 32 million Americans who are currently uninsured.
According to CBS News, the uninsured and self-employed will be able to purchase insurance through state-based exchanges with subsidies available to individuals and families with income between the 133 and 400 percent of the poverty level.
Payment for the plan will involve a 3.8 percent tax on income for families making more than $250,000 per year and $200,000 for individuals.
Duquesne University sophomore Jamie Breitinger thought this tax could not come at a worse time. She agreed that it is a shame so many people in this country are either underinsured or uninsured completely, and thus have to make decisions about whether or not theycan afford certain treatments. She feels that people should not suffer because they cannot afford proper health care.
“Just because something seems like a good idea on paper, does not necessarily mean that it would be a good idea to pass it as a bill,” said Breitinger. “I think that overall, it is an extremely expensive course of action being taken when the nation’s economy has not completely recovered yet, nor will it any time in the immediate future.”
There will also be reforms to Medicaid: Medicaid will be expanded to include 133 percent of federal poverty level; states are required to expand Medicaid to include childless adults in 2014, and the federal government will pay 100 percent of the costs to cover newly eligible people throughout 2016. Illegal immigrants will not be eligible for Medicaid.
“The possibility for catastrophe that this bill poses to the American health care system is serious; reform is needed, I don’t deny that,” said registered nurse Felicia Gross. “I just know we won’t have enough help to deal with the new loads of people that will come pouring in.”
Beyond Medicaid, there will be reforms for insurance companies as well. Companies will no longer be permitted to deny children coverage based on pre-existing conditions after six months; insurance companies can not deny coverage to anyone starting 2014; insurance companies have to let children stay on their parents’ insurance plans until age 26.
Some of these reforms brought special interest and comments from University of Pittsburgh student Andrew Flowers, ’12.
“Sure, it says that insurance companies can’t turn away children with pre-existing conditions, but I’m sure insurance companies will find other reasons not to cover them,” said Flowers.
With all things considered, one thing is certain: the bill has created mixed reactions but many people think this reform was needed.
The American public expresses critique and praise on the issue of health care reform, but it is here, whether it is liked or not.
Rebecca Canterbury • Apr 29, 2010 at 9:54 pm
Alexandra,
if you take notice to the comment from Andrew Flowers, you will notice that his comment was very liberal. He was saying that he doesn’t think it was far enough.
He AGREES with it.
Jamie Breitinger supported the bill, but she had misgivings (as did Flowers).
“With all things considered, one thing is certain: the bill has created mixed reactions but many people think this reform was needed.”
Mostly everyone supports the bill, but you will be hard pressed to find someone who is whole-heartedly with this issue.
Everyone is going to have something that they don’t like about it, and that is what I was conveying about it.
If they do, they are going in with the wool pulled over their eyes.
As for this being just like Fox News, Fox News would not bring up issues such as children being denied health care.
I sent you the entire article that I wrote via email, because, as you know, articles get cut when published.
Many people thought this reform was needed, that is all I will say on the matter.
jaffea • Apr 29, 2010 at 5:54 pm
@Fair and Balanced
My understanding of the assignment was it was supposed to cover the response of the Allegheny community to the health care bill. Any article we publish in the Campus is Allegheny-oriented, and while I agree it is refreshing and important to add outside points of view, completely overlooking the points of view on our campus creates an article that could be published anywhere and doesn’t offer anything unique to Allegheny students that they couldn’t pick up from the daily newspaper or online. Also, I agree–quotes are opinions. But a journalist will always look for an opposing viewpoint just to show the range of ideas and conflicts surrounding the story; otherwise, they are not telling the full story. I don’t think it would have been that hard to find one or two quotes from people who agreed with or praised the bill, to balance out the coverage.
Steven Jones • Apr 29, 2010 at 3:06 pm
I realize I may have made comments that imply this paper could be plagarism. That is a serious offense to Rebecca as well as The Campus paper, and the comment was made over disappointment in what the article provided, not over any substantial facts. My apologies to Rebecca Canterbury and to The Campus.
Steven Jones • Apr 29, 2010 at 2:50 pm
This article seems too little too late. It doesn’t include the opinions of any Allegheny students as Alexandra mentions. This article mostly comes off as apathetic and pessimistic towards anything good coming out of D.C.
And there seems to be the lack of information describing how when people were polled about the various provisions as individual laws, they loved it. But when it was all put together as a giant bill, it was less favorable.
My only complaint is that this article does not provide ‘mixed’, but mostly negative reactions to the Healthcare Bill, listing off the most promising aspects as miniscule details. This almost sounds like it was copied from a Pittsburgh paper and put here as an Allegheny story.
Fair and Balanced • Apr 29, 2010 at 2:28 pm
@ Alexandra Jaffe
Who said that when people write articles for a school newspaper that it had to include sources from that particular school? Did it ever occur to you that it may be refreshing to get opinions from those who attend learning instituions, other than the one you sit and learn from 5 days a week? Facts are facts… and that was what was presented here. As for the negative opinions that were given by the interviewees, opinions are just that… opinions. When interviewing people you are not going to have an even amount of positive or negative responses on a certain topic. So deal with it. Not everyone who attends Allegheny College or reads its newspaper keeps up with health care reform, so its nice to see something published for those students who can quickly get the facts. Don’t be so closed minded about what is published.
Great job presenting the facts and opinions on this sensitive subject!!
Alexandra Jaffe • Apr 29, 2010 at 4:45 am
This isn’t news–It’s opinion, at best. You offer us three sources, none of whom are from Allegheny, all of whom have something negative to say about the bill. The article doesn’t really tell students anything new or offer us an insight into how the bill will affect Allegheny specifically. Honestly, this column is as fair and balanced as Fox news.